The Kinnock Reform was badly conceived and badly negotiated on the bases of promises essentially vacuous. The ultimate category passages – symbol of reward of merit – were completely vacuous of meaning and were progressively replaced by rather deceiving certification / attestation procedures. R&D mobilised itself at the side of all the current and future transcatégorials to give once again a meaning to this procedure which allowed numerous colleagues to make the most of their merits without necessarily depending of their hierarchy. R&D’s approach is double: political and judicial.
Political:
R&D is negotiating the organisation of new internal competitions and better conditions of category passage.
Judicial:
-
R&D introduced a first case (T-421/05) in front of the court.
-
R&D puts at the disposition of the colleagues a complaint model for all the colleagues who were nominated in a higher category: Disclaimer Complaint text Procedure to follow Plaintiff file “category passage”
| March 2010 | Three cases entered the oral phase (F-64/06, F-126/06, F-130/06 and F 113-05) and will be pled these March 22nd and 24th 2008 with the court. The last case (F-23/06), relating to only the passages of category, was temporarily suspended in waiting of the judgment of the Angé Serrano case (C-496/08), finally delivered this March 4th, 2010. |
|
|
October 2008
|
||
|
September 2008
|
Compensatory payment | |
|
March 2006
|
Appeal |