Promotions

Promotions

We have continued to denounce the dysfunctions of the exercise, in particular the erratic distribution of quota by DG who deprives the exercise of all credibility reducing it to a real lottery.

At the same time, we defended the rights and expectations of colleagues at every stage of the procedure – in particular the meetings with the DGs and the meetings of the promotion committees – and at each stage of the litigation aimed at challenging the decisions adopted by the Appointing Authority.

R&D requests

  • the introduction of a fair evaluation and promotion procedure, based on the best experiences of the other institutions, in particular that of the European Parliament;
  • the valuing of the qualities and skills of each one with effective and credible appeal procedures to correct errors and abuses;
  • the strict adherence to promotion rates according to Annex IB and to average permanence in all grades
  • the taking into account of the works in the interest of the service and the Institution;
  • the establishment of a credible 360​° and 90° evaluation procedure for the members of the management, the results of which would be taken into account.