{"id":13271,"date":"2015-10-01T18:03:00","date_gmt":"2015-10-01T17:03:00","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=13271"},"modified":"2015-10-07T11:25:57","modified_gmt":"2015-10-07T10:25:57","slug":"13271","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/renouveau-democratie.eu\/fr\/2015\/10\/13271\/","title":{"rendered":"Une d\u00e9cision du Tribunal de l’UE pourrait-elle influencer les promotions et les carri\u00e8res de tous les grades AST et AD?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Dans l’affaire \u00a0\u00bb ANAGNOSTU\u00a0\u00bb<\/strong><\/span> (<\/strong>F-72\/11<\/span><\/strong><\/a>), LE TRIBUNAL CONDAMNE LA COMMISSION POUR MAUVAISE ADMINISTRATION et violation du Statut concernant les PROMOTIONS.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s 4 ans de proc\u00e9dure, le Tribunal a stipul\u00e9 que la Commission a proc\u00e9d\u00e9 \u00e0 une mauvaise application des r\u00e8gles concernant les taux de promotion impos\u00e9s par le Statut. En effet, pendant des ann\u00e9es, la DG HR a calcul\u00e9 de fa\u00e7on arbitraire des taux de promotion, qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 syst\u00e9matiquement et ill\u00e9galement impos\u00e9s aux Comit\u00e9s Paritaires de promotion depuis 2004.<\/span><\/p>\n

Nous f\u00e9licitons avec enthousiasme ces coll\u00e8gues qui ont port\u00e9 l’affaire devant le Tribunal et qui obtenu ce r\u00e9sultat important.<\/span><\/p>\n

Les membres de R<\/strong>&<\/strong><\/span>D <\/strong><\/span>ont contribu\u00e9 de mani\u00e8re d\u00e9cisive \u00e0 cette action collective, qui suit exactement la position de R<\/strong>&<\/strong><\/span>D <\/span><\/strong><\/span>pr\u00f4n\u00e9e depuis des ann\u00e9es aux Comit\u00e9s paritaires de promotion ainsi que par le biais des tracts destin\u00e9s au personnel et des courriers adress\u00e9s \u00e0 la fois \u00e0 la Commission et \u00e0 son Administration.<\/p>\n

Nous avons pu constater, de fa\u00e7on lamentable, que nos arguments \u00e9taient tomb\u00e9s dans des oreilles de sourds dignitaires qui ne semblaient pas \u00eatre suffisamment concern\u00e9s par l’obligation l\u00e9gale de respecter de mani\u00e8re tr\u00e8s pr\u00e9cise les prescriptions statu\u00adtaires pour la bonne application du Statut. [En savoir plus sur les\u00a0 positions de <\/span>R<\/strong>&<\/strong><\/span>D<\/strong><\/span>: <\/span>Exercice de promotion et quotas<\/span><\/a>]<\/span><\/p>\n

FORCE EST DE RECONNAITRE QUE LE CAS DES MAUVAIS TAUX DE PROMOTIONS DES AD12 ET AD13 REFLETE SEULEMENT LA PARTIE VISIBLE D’UN ICEBERG QUI CACHE LES TAUX DE PROMOTIONS ERRON\u00c9S en reportant INJUSTEMENT LES PROMO\u00adTIONS CE qui ralentit les CARRI\u00c8RES avec de substantielles… cons\u00e9quences financi\u00e8res pour le personnel depuis 2004.<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

En r\u00e9alit\u00e9, il suffit de se pencher sur les statistiques officielles ci-dessous [extraites des conclusions du Comit\u00e9 de Suivi qui super\u00advise \u00e0 posteriori chaque exercice de promotion] afin de pouvoir comparer\u00a0 les taux de promotions statutaires et r\u00e9ellement consta\u00adt\u00e9s et de pouvoir en conclure qu’entre 2004 et 2014, les taux r\u00e9els de promotion ont \u00e9t\u00e9 inf\u00e9rieurs \u00e0 ceux pr\u00e9vus par le Statut pour l’\u00e9crasante majorit\u00e9 des deux grades AST et AD (actuellement pour 22 grades (en rouge) sur 27).<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

GRADES<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

REAL PROMOTION RATES<\/span><\/td>\nSTATUTORY PROMOTION RATES<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST10<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n8.6%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n20%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST9<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n11.2%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n20%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST8<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n17.5%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n25%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST7<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n21.5%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n25%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST6<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n23.5%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n25%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST5<\/span><\/td>\n28.3%<\/span><\/td>\n25%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST4<\/span><\/td>\n34.1%<\/span><\/td>\n33%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST3<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n26.5%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n33%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST2<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n25.1%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n33%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST1<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n27.9%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n33%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST6\/C<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n10.6%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n20%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST5\/C<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n14.7%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n22.5%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST4\/C<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n19.8%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n22.5%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST3\/C<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n22.5%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n25%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST2\/C<\/span><\/td>\n39%<\/span><\/td>\n25%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST4\/D<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n8.9%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n10%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST3\/D<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n19.9%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n22.5%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AST2\/D<\/span><\/td>\n39.8%<\/span><\/td>\n22.5%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AD13<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n4%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n20%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AD12<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n13.1%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n20%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AD11<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n23.2%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n25%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AD10<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n21.2%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n25%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AD9<\/span><\/td>\n25.5%<\/span><\/td>\n25%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AD8<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n26.3%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n33%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AD7<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n26.1%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n33%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AD6<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n27.1%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n33%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AD5<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n28.1%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n33%<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

La d\u00e9cision intervient juste quelques semaines avant la tenue des nouveaux Comit\u00e9s de promotion pour le personnel de grade AST et AD pr\u00e9vue le 13\/10\/2015. Il est douloureux de rappeler l’insuffisance chronique de la DG HR \u00e0 appliquer correctement le Statut concernant les promotions et les carri\u00e8res.<\/p>\n

La nouvelle Commission et le Vice-pr\u00e9sident en charge du dossier vont-ils finalement apporter les changements n\u00e9cessaires au niveau de la DG HR et prendre toutes les mesures n\u00e9cessaires afin de rectifier <\/span>UNE FOIS POUR TOUTE<\/span><\/strong> cette situation pourrie en compensant r\u00e9troactivement tous les coll\u00e8gues d\u00e9vou\u00e9s, touch\u00e9s par ces pratiques ill\u00e9gales et qui ont travaill\u00e9 dur?<\/span><\/p>\n

Seul le temps pourra nous dire si cette d\u00e9cision conjointement avec les donn\u00e9es officielles pourront mettre fin \u00e0 cette approche des hauts grad\u00e9s de la Commission \u00ab\u00a0je n’ai rien vu, je n’ai rien entendu\u00a0\u00bb qui est devenue un alibi pour nier l’existence m\u00eame d’un probl\u00e8me r\u00e9el et \u00e9pineux concernant le ralentissement ill\u00e9gal et ill\u00e9gitime de carri\u00e8re de <\/span>tout<\/span><\/strong><\/span> le personnel.<\/span><\/p>\n

LIRE L\u2019INTEGRALITE DE L\u2019ARRET<\/span><\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dans l’affaire \u00a0\u00bb ANAGNOSTU\u00a0\u00bb (F-72\/11), LE TRIBUNAL CONDAMNE LA COMMISSION POUR MAUVAISE ADMINISTRATION et violation du Statut concernant les PROMOTIONS. Apr\u00e8s 4 ans de proc\u00e9dure, le Tribunal a stipul\u00e9 que la Commission a proc\u00e9d\u00e9 \u00e0 une mauvaise application des r\u00e8gles concernant les taux de promotion impos\u00e9s par le Statut. En effet, pendant des ann\u00e9es, la […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/renouveau-democratie.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13271"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/renouveau-democratie.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/renouveau-democratie.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/renouveau-democratie.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/renouveau-democratie.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13271"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/renouveau-democratie.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13271\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13282,"href":"https:\/\/renouveau-democratie.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13271\/revisions\/13282"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/renouveau-democratie.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13271"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/renouveau-democratie.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13271"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/renouveau-democratie.eu\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13271"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}