In future, your choice will be limited to: offices, agencies or privatisation!
Brussels, 29 January 2001
In July 2000, as part of the work of the ‘Peer Group’, the Commission asked a number of Directorates-General, including DG ADMIN, to carry out studies on the subject of out-sourcing (i.e. sub-contracting some Commission managerial and executive tasks either by opening offices or agencies, or by privatising).

DG ADMIN asked two specialist consultants to carry out their analyses in such a way that each of the three options (offices, agencies and privatisation) was evaluated in the light of the current situation: any decision involving the out-sourcing of activities had to include proof of real added value in terms of both quality of service (which must remain at least the same) and profitability.

The out-sourcing study initiated by DG ADMIN is in three parts: an initial ‘feasibility’ study, a ‘cost-benefit’ analysis, and a political evaluation (by DG ADMIN). The first two analyses were completed by two separate consultants so as to ensure the best possible guarantee of independence and objectivity.

The first consultant presented the results of the feasibility study in November 2000. No surprises there: the analysis concluded that with regard to activities that had been identified by the College as potentially capable of being out-sourced, there was nothing to stop that happening.

The second consultant will do the cost-benefit analysis so that DG ADMIN has information on the pros and cons of each option.

In mid-February, on the basis of collegial meetings with all Heads of Unit affected by out-sourcing (12 January in Brussels, 17 January in Luxembourg) and of meetings with each of them individually, the consultant will present an intermediary report that will be quickly distributed to Heads of Unit for their comments. The final report will be delivered in mid-March. DG ADMIN will present its political analysis, and Mr Kinnock will give a presentation to the Commission.

DG ADMIN is already committed to offering affected staff the appropriate guarantees, and will do all within its power to ensure that any decision on out-sourcing is complimented by a package of support measures, compulsorily including a careers’ advice service, opportunities for training and re-training, and an early retirement scheme.

R&D wants answers to the following questions:

  • Has expenditure linked to support measures guaranteed by DG ADMIN yet been evaluated, and will it play an integral part in the cost-benefit analysis?
  • Will the planned support measures also include measures to cover dismissal for under-performance? (In the various services to be out-sourced, there are many specialist colleagues who will find it hard to find other jobs that match their skills: will expenditure incurred over these dismissals appear among the priorities of the consultants’ ‘cost-benefit’ studies?)
  • Why has staff representation not been incorporated into this exercise? (Once again, the Commission has applied new, ‘modern’ social dialogue by presenting the trade unions with a fait accompli.)
  • How will an out-sourced medical service maintain its independence, and ensure that data contained in our colleagues’ medical records remain confidential?
  • Could the Commission or DG ADMIN possibly have expected from these consultants any result other than a green light for out-sourcing? Who will be the first beneficiaries of these out-sourcing exercises? The same consultancies, perhaps? You’d have to be fool or a liar to think anything else!

R&D will be calling on all staff and the other trade unions to mobilise against this out-sourcing.

Today DG ADMIN. Whose turn will it be tomorrow?

 

Activities at DG ADMIN identified by the College as

potentially capable of being out-sourced

1. Management of infrastructures and goods, and supply of technical services

Management of infrastructures and goods

1.1. Monitoring occupational health and safety

1.2. Upkeep

1.3. Removals

1.4. Office materials and furniture

1.5. Inventory

Supply of technical services

1.6. Receptionists/Ushers/Buildings Managers

1.7. Brussels Protection

1.8. Evaluation and prevention of hazards

1.9. Carpool

1.10. Typing services

1.11. Courier service

1.12. Contractual and logistic support

1.13. Information systems and IT infrastructure (Directorate-General)

2. Social Infrastructures

2.1. Crèches and nurseries

2.2. Restaurants/Central catering

2.3. Overijse Centre

3. Administrative tasks linked to the Staff Regulations (e.g. pay and reimbursement of expenses)

3.1. Payment of salary

3.2. Payment of mission expenses

3.3. Payment of experts’ expenses

3.4. Health and accident insurance

3.5. Pensions

4. Medical Service

The Executive Committee


Pour adhérer à R&D/To join R&D :
NOM/NAME :

Address adm.

envoyez ce talon à/send this stub to: Marina OGLE L 102 7/12
Pour avoir plus d’informations sur R&D/To receive more information on R&D :
Le secrétariat politique : Olga PROFILI/Cristiano SEBASTIANI (55676/55656/99329)
Luxembourg, à Paul Van BUITENEN, EUFO 4255, ?33036 Michel THIERRY, JMO B3/26A, ?35843
CDR, à Sybren SINGELSMA (ARD 613, tél. 282.21.87)
CES, à Charles POTIER, 2 rue Ravenstein, 1000 Bruxelles (546.93.31)




Membres du Comité Exécutif: Ianniello Franco, Adurno Giuseppe, Zorbas Gerassimos, Ravagli Alessandra, Uguccioni Bruno, Docherty Michael, Vassila-Souyoul Erica, Bochu Claude, Drevet Jean-François, Napolitano Raffaele, Crespinet Alain, Sybren Singelsma, Paul Frank, Panarisi Edi, Sperling Christiane, Domingos Dias.